PUCSL approves calling tenders for 2nd LNG Plant
The Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) has given the go ahead to the Ceylon Electricity Board to invite tenders for a second Re-gasified Liquid Natural Gas-fired Combined Cycle Power Plant, to be built in Kerawalapitiya.
According to PCUSL Chairman Janaka Rathnayake, in May, the Ceylon Electricity Board requested PUCSL to permit it to tender this power plant under Build, Own and Operate (BOO) basis.
PCUSL held an emergency meeting on 4 June to go through the proposal and approved the request with changes including the power plant to be tendered under Build, Own, Operate and Transfer (BOOT) basis, considering the least cost principals and economic factors and required it to revise the conditions of the agreement with regard to decommissioning cost as any decommissioning cost added in the plant cost to be paid back to Ceylon Electricity Board, if the utility decides to take over the plant at the end of the contract period, Rathnayake said.
“We expect the power plant to be developed on Build, Own, Operate and Transfer basis, where the plant is developed and operated by an Independent Power Producer (IPP) and transferred to the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) at the end of the 26-year contract period, at the will of CEB,” he said.
The plant is expected to be available for open-cycle operation in 2023 and a combined cycle operation in 2024. The 300 MW power plant is capable of adding more than 1,800 GWh annual generation to the system and designed as a dual-fuel power plant, which can generate electricity using both Natural Gas and Diesel.
Once the Natural Gas supply is in place, the plant is expected to replace expensive fuel oil-based generation, he said. CEB initially proposed to tender this power plant, in September 2020, with the conditions of entering into a 21-year contract, when the lifetime of the power plant is 30 years.
According to the initial proposal, the plant may be transferred to the CEB at the end of the 21-year lifetime, where the developer can recover the full cost of the plant during the 21-year period. The proposal also mentioned that in a situation where the plant is not being transferred to CEB, the developer has to bear the cost of decommissioning the plant. At the same time, the CEB has required the developer to bear the refurbishment cost of the plant, in case it is transferred to the CEB.
Considering the initial proposal, the PUCSL issued a decision on October 2020, requiring CEB to make the lifetime of the plant and the contract period to be equal and to conduct the project under Built Own and Operate (BOO) model, without giving the option of transferring the power plant to CEB, as the initial proposal violates the least cost principals and to minimie the unnecessary burden passed to the electricity consumers. (MA)